腰椎论坛

这里是一群很优秀的人,因为他们从骨子里就非常突出!

 找回密码
 立即注册
腰椎论坛»腰椎论坛 突友大家谈 人工椎间盘在欧美等地开展和研究。这个是表姐翻译的 ...   『 交流腰椎间盘突出治疗方法,分享腰突症康复经验 』
回复 发新帖

标题: 人工椎间盘在欧美等地开展和研究。这个是表姐翻译的

  [复制链接]
注册会员
帖子
18
积分
1
银子
60 两
精华
0
注册时间
2009-12-20
 楼主|发表于 2010-1-8 17:15 | 个人空间 | 显示全部楼层 | 收藏本帖
这个是托表姐 在澳洲查的,让我们尽早期待人工椎间盘的普及和问世~!! 下面是文章 内容 表姐翻译的

    目前, 人工腰间盘替换手术还是实验性的, 还未被美国食品药品监督局认可. 大多数研究在欧洲进行.
有不同的模型, 但用的最广泛最知名的人工腰间盘是LINK SB Charite III假体,
由德国汉堡Waldemar Link GmbH 公司制造。
此模型由两个金属盘组成,
之间有齿锚住骨骼或脊椎,
两盘之间是用来移动的聚乙烯橡皮核心。

   有个人回答:我20岁,我之前有在人工腰间盘移植手术和溶合手术间选择,我选择了溶合手术,因为1015年后人工盘就磨损了,之后还必须做溶合手术,
这是我的医生告诉我的。但我理解你的痛苦,
我做了溶合,我觉得我不能再做喜欢的事情了,如滑雪等。
但我医生说大概35个月,
我都可以做这些事,
但也会有风险。人工盘移植是通过胃部来做的。但最大的风险是瘫痪。


这是关于人工盘和风险的网站:http://www.spineuniverse.com/displayarticle.php/article2950.html


    此术的开发是用来替代脊椎融合术,以去痛为目的的,并允许脊椎间移动的。另一个好处是没有融合术的潜在风险:防止邻近脊椎的过早衰退。
    数据显示,人工盘移植的病人,和融合术病人相比,手术更短,失血更少,住院短,更快术后恢复。



FDA IDE Clinical Trial


Lumbar ADR




Five (5) Year Results


Charite'人工盘


LIF (BAK cage, Fusion)


融合术

Patients病人
90
43
Overall Success成功率
57.8%
51.2%
Mean Change Baseline ODI
-24
-27.5
Patient Satisfaction满意度
78%
72%
Full-Time Employment
65.6%
46.5%
Long Term Disability长期伤残
8.0%
20.9%
Additional Surgery at Index Level
加做手术
7.7%
16.3%
Mean ROM Index Level (degrees)
6.0
1.0
Source
PubMed
18805066

Spine Journal
2008

本帖最近版主评分
关玉门 积分 + 1 感谢热心分享! 2010-1-8 21:20
← 扫一扫直达 本贴手机版


◎ 本贴链接:http://www.yz-bbs.com/thread-7314-1-1.html
注册会员
帖子
18
积分
1
银子
60 两
精华
0
注册时间
2009-12-20
 楼主| 发表于 2010-1-8 19:02 | 个人空间 | 显示全部楼层

1

上面有网站 大家可以去看下人工椎间盘的样子


版主
帖子
1468
积分
17
银子
3418 两
精华
1
注册时间
2007-11-7

热心突友

发表于 2010-1-8 21:20 | 个人空间 | 显示全部楼层
非常感谢楼主翻译分享!
无论是一大步还是一小步,科技发展总是带动我们希望的脚步。

拷贝原文如下:

Spine Surgeons Speak Out About Artificial Disc Replacement
Artificial Discs: Spine Experts Speak Out - Part 2

The approval in 2004 of an artificial disc to treat degenerative disc disease has had lots of people talking. It is a cure for back pain or just another high-tech, high priced gadget? The answer probably lies somewhere between. SpineUniverse spoke to several renowned and respected spine specialists about their opinions of this new technology. Read on to find out what these experts think.




Rick Delamarter, MD
Orthopaedic Surgeon
The Spine Institute at Saint John's Health Center
Santa Monica, CA
In my opinion, the artificial disc is the most revolutionary technology to hit spine surgery ever. It relieves pain while retaining motion, all without the need for fusion. It's easier on patients and the recovery is quicker. I am very encouraged.

Michael Fehlings, MD
Professor, Division of Neurosurgery
Krembil Chair in Neural Repair & Regeneration
University of Toronto
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Disc replacement represents an exciting new treatment option for back pain associated with lumbar degenerative disc disease. The recent clinical trial with the CHARITÉ™ Artificial Disc appears promising. There are a few potential concerns, however. While artificial discs appear safe when used in experienced hands, they are not for everyone. Patients with multi-level lumbar pathology are less likely to benefit than patients with one-level of lumbar disc degeneration.
There are potentially serious operative risks that the patient needs to consider before opting for an artificial disc. No patient should consider this option without first trying high-quality non-operative treatments for at least six months. Patients should also be aware that the long-term outcomes of artificial discs are still not well-known and that revision surgery may be required down the road.


Richard G. Guyer, MD
Orthopaedic Surgeon
Co-Founder and Fellowship Director
Texas Back Institute
Plano, TX
Disc replacement is the most significant advancement since the modern treatment of spinal disorders began 70 years ago. Further, disc replacement introduces a new era of motion preserving surgeries that will include facet joint replacement, nucleus replacement, and minimally invasive motion preservation devices.
The lives of millions of patients will change for the better. Having been one of the original United States (US) investigators during the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) study of the CHARITÉ™ Artificial Disc during the last four and one-half years, I can honestly say that this is one of the most satisfying operations that I perform. To see patients who have suffered with chronic back pain for years only to return to normal pain free lives is truly amazing.
But the patient must be wary, because not all patients can expect to be "normal". The FDA study of the CHARITÉ™ Artificial Disc showed that patients had less pain and better function than the fusion patients and that they were happier. They were not however totally pain-free. In my personal series, about 40% of patients were pain-free while the others were improved. The challenge for the patient is to have realistic expectations. Not every patient will be able to be pain free or "hit the home run", as I explain to my patients.
We have learned through our studies that patient selection is extremely important and proper placement of the artificial disc is important to obtain the best possible results. The challenge for the surgical community is to select patients by adhering to the same strict criteria of the study, obtain proper training in the implantation of these devices, and perform the surgery properly to maximize the results.

Isador Lieberman, MD, MBA, FRCS(C)
Orthopaedic and Spinal Surgeon
The Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, OH
A few points to make regarding artificial disc technology:
• Disc replacement represents a whole new spectrum of treatments for patients suffering from degenerative discs.
• The indications for disc replacement are limited - this will not be the absolute cure for all that ails the spine.
• Surgeons who perform this surgery must be trained and should have past experience with anterior spine surgery.
• The risks include misplacement, dislodgement, injury to surrounding organs and vessels during implantation, as well as all of the usual risks of spinal surgery.
• The longevity of artificial discs is yet known. If it only lasts 10 years, the patient will definitely need further surgery.
• Revision disc replacement surgery will be a life-threatening operation.
• As of now, insurance reimbursement for this procedure has not been verified.
• Patients need to remember that back pain is not life threatening, but spinal surgery can be.


本贴包含图片/附件

你需要 [ 登录 ] 才可以下载或查看。没有帐号?[ 立即注册 ]

注册会员
帖子
22
积分
0
银子
44 两
精华
0
注册时间
2009-12-29
发表于 2010-1-8 23:05 | 个人空间 | 显示全部楼层

游客不能查看本楼内容

你需要 [ 登录 ] 才可以查看。没有帐号?[ 立即注册 ]


安静会员
帖子
188
积分
0
银子
428 两
精华
0
注册时间
2009-9-19
发表于 2010-1-9 01:30 | 个人空间 | 显示全部楼层

游客不能查看本楼内容

你需要 [ 登录 ] 才可以查看。没有帐号?[ 立即注册 ]


注册会员
帖子
18
积分
1
银子
60 两
精华
0
注册时间
2009-12-20
 楼主| 发表于 2010-1-9 11:21 | 个人空间 | 显示全部楼层

人工椎间盘

医生告诉我融合术已经有40多年的经验,现在在临床上算重建的金模式。
相信技术快了 这是瑞金医院主任医生对我说的:
看起来你对腰椎手术中的重建技术很有兴趣。
事实上,腰椎的重建技术有融合和非融合之分。传统腰椎的内固定和融合经历了很长时间的检验,至今仍是重建手术的金标准。非融合技术在近年来发展很快,除了腰椎人工椎间盘置换以外,还有腰椎后路的动力性固定等,目的是减少融合带来的对邻近节段的不良影响。
说了那么多术语,是要表达两个意思。1. 腰椎人工椎间盘置换并非新的技术。2. 腰椎人工椎间盘置换有其适用的指征,如腰椎间盘源性腰痛等。而这些适应症,由于各种原因,在目前的脊柱外科临床工作中,还没有被广大病家,甚至是有些脊柱外科医生所普遍接受。另外,人工腰椎间盘也有一定的技术要求。
综上所述,人工腰椎间盘置换是腰椎重建手术的选项之一,临床上还应根据病情,作针对性选择。


发新帖

这里是一群很优秀的人,因为他们从骨子里就非常突出!
World without strangers, www.yz-bbs.com

手机版|合作|联系|关于|腰椎论坛

GMT+8, 2024-11-25 12:37

www.yz-bbs.com
2006--2021 版权所有 所有权利保留